Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)

Substitutes in Rigid Polyurethane and Polyisocyanurate Laminated Boardstock

Substitutes are reviewed on the basis of environmental and health risks, including factors such as ozone depletion potential, global warming potential, toxicity, flammability, and exposure potential. Lists of acceptableThis designation means that a substitute may be used, without restriction, to replace the relevant ODS within the end-use specified. For example, HCFC-22 is an acceptable substitute for R-502 in industrial process refrigeration. Note that all SNAP determinations apply to the use of a specific product as a substitute for a specific ODS in a specific end-use. and UnacceptableThis designation means that it is illegal to use a product as a substitute for an ODS in a specific end-use. For example, HCFC-141b is an unacceptable substitute for CFC-11 in building chillers. Note that all SNAP determinations apply to the use of a specific product as a substitute for a specific ODS in a specific end-use. substitutes are updated several times each year. The list of substitutes is shown below.

Many acceptable substitutes under SNAP may be restricted under the Technology Transitions Program. For more information on Technology Transitions Program restrictions, visit: https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/technology-transitions-program

Note: SNAP-related information published in the Federal Register takes precedence over all information on this page.

Filters              
Substitute Trade Name(s) ODPA number that refers to the amount of ozone depletion caused by a substance. The ODP is the ratio of the impact on ozone of a chemical compared to the impact of a similar mass of CFC-11. Thus, the ODP of CFC-11 is defined to be 1.0. Other CFCs and HCFCs have ODPs that range from 0.01 to 1.0. The halons have ODPs ranging up to 10. Carbon tetrachloride has an ODP of 1.2, and methyl chloroform's ODP is 0.11. HFCs have zero ODP because they do not contain chlorine. A table of all ozone-depleting substances (http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/ods/index.html) shows their ODPs, GWPs, and CAS numbers. GWPThe index used to translate the level of emissions of various gases into a common measure in order to compare the relative radiative forcing of different gases without directly calculating the changes in atmospheric concentrations. GWPs are calculated as the ratio of the radiative forcing that would result from the emissions of one kilogram of a greenhouse gas to that from the emission of one kilogram of carbon dioxide over a period of time (usually 100 years). Gases involved in complex atmospheric chemical processes have not been assigned GWPs. See lifetime. Flammable SNAP Listing Date Listing Status [1] Further Information
2-Chloropropane   0 5 or less yes March 18, 1994;
June 19, 2000 (pdf) (224 KB)
Acceptable Analysis of toxicity data available suggest an acceptable exposure limit of 350 ppm (8-hour time-weighted average).
Blends of HFC-245fa and HCFC-22   >0 N/A no August 21, 2003 (pdf) (161 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB)
Unacceptable as of September 18, 2015.  
Carbon Dioxide   0 1 no March 18, 1994;
June 8, 1999 (pdf) (143 KB)
Acceptable  
Methyl Formate EcomateTM 0 5 or less yes August 21, 2003 (pdf) (161 KB) Acceptable  
Electroset Technology   0 N/A N/A August 26, 1994;
June 16, 2010 (pdf) (229 KB)
Acceptable  
Exxsol Blowing Agents Exxsol Blowing Agents 0 5 or less yes December 6, 1999 (pdf) (226 KB);
June 16, 2010 (pdf) (229 KB)
Acceptable  
Formacel® TI Formacel® TI 0 1,330 - 1,500 no September 30, 2009 (pdf) (173 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB);
December 1, 2016 (pdf) (969 KB)
Unacceptable, except where allowed under narrowed use limits for military or space- and aeronautics-related applications, as of January 1, 2017.

Unacceptable for military applications as of January 1, 2022 and for space- and aeronautics-related applications as of January 1, 2025.
 
Formic Acid   0 5 or less yes [3] September 5, 1996 Acceptable  
HCFC-123   0.02 77 no March 18, 1994 Acceptable  
HCFC-124   0.022 609 no July 22, 2002 (pdf) (218 KB) Unacceptable Alternatives exist with lower or zero ODP.
HCFC-141b   0.12 725 no September 30, 2004 (pdf) (199 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB)
Unacceptable Alternatives exist with lower or zero ODP.
HCFC-141b/HCFC-123 Blends   >0 N/A no March 18, 1994;
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB)
Unacceptable as of September 18, 2015.  
HCFC-22, HCFC-142b or blends thereof   >0 N/A no July 22, 2002 (pdf) (218 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB)
Unacceptable Alternatives exist with lower or zero ODP.
HFC-134a   0 1,430 no March 18, 1994;
June 8, 1999 (pdf) (143 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB);
December 1, 2016 (pdf) (969 KB)
Unacceptable, except where allowed under narrowed use limits for military or space- and aeronautics-related applications, as of January 1, 2017.

Unacceptable for military applications as of January 1, 2022 and for space- and aeronautics-related applications as of January 1, 2025.
 
HFC-152a   0 124 yes March 18, 1994;
June 8, 1999 (pdf) (143 KB)
Acceptable  
HFC-245fa   0 1,030 no December 6, 1999 (pdf) (226 KB);
August 21, 2003 (pdf) (161 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB);
December 1, 2016 (pdf) (969 KB)
Unacceptable, except where allowed under narrowed use limits for military or space- and aeronautics-related applications, as of January 1, 2017.

Unacceptable for military applications as of January 1, 2022 and for space- and aeronautics-related applications as of January 1, 2025.
 
HFC-365mfc   0 794 yes September 30, 2009 (pdf) (173 KB);
June 16, 2010 (pdf) (229 KB);
July 20, 2015 (pdf) (687 KB);
December 1, 2016 (pdf) (969 KB)
Unacceptable, except where allowed under narrowed use limits for military or space- and aeronautics-related applications, as of January 1, 2017.

Unacceptable for military applications as of January 1, 2022 and for space- and aeronautics-related applications as of January 1, 2025.
 
HFO-1234ze   0 6 no June 16, 2010 (pdf) (229 KB) Acceptable CAS Reg. No. is 29118-24-9. Recommended workplace exposure limit of 1,000 ppm.
HFO-1336mzz(E) Opteon™ 1150 0 16 no December 11, 2020 (pdf) (263 KB) Acceptable CAS Reg. No. is 66711-86-2.
Recommended Workplace Environmental Exposure Limit (WEEL) of 400 ppm (8-hr TWA).
HFO–1336mzz(Z) ((Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluorobut-2-ene) Formacel® 1100, FEA-1100 0 9 no October 21, 2014 (pdf) (346 KB) Acceptable  
Methyl Formate   0 5 or less yes December 18, 2000 (pdf) (257 KB) Acceptable  
Methylal (dimethoxymethane)   0 <3 yes October 21, 2014 (pdf) (346 KB) Acceptable  
Saturated Light Hydrocarbons (C3-C6)   0 3 - 10 yes March 18, 1994;
April 11, 2000 (pdf) (220 KB);
June 16, 2010 (pdf) (229 KB)
Acceptable  
Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene  Solstice® 1233zd(E) 0.00024 - 0.00034 4.7 - 7 no August 10, 2012 Acceptable CAS Reg. No. is 102687-65-0. The manufacturer recommends an acceptable exposure limit (AEL) of 300 ppm (8-hr TWA).
TranscendTM Technologies TranscendTM Technologies 0 5 or less yes[2] March 29, 2006 (pdf) (181 KB) Acceptable as an additive to SNAP-approved blowing agents in blends making up to 5% by weight of the total foam formulation.  
Water   0 N/A no June 8, 1999 (pdf) (143 KB) Acceptable  
Acetone/Isopentane Blend   0 < 10 yes October 4, 2018 (pdf) (308 KB) Acceptable  

1 Use of closed cell foam products and products that contain closed cell foam manufactured with an Unacceptable foam blowing agent prohibited on or before the later of: 1) December 1, 2017, or 2) the date when the foam blowing agent is Unacceptable.

2 When blended with fire retardant and/or other SNAP-approved alternatives, the flammability of TranscendTM Technologies can be reduced to make a formulation that is either combustible or non-flammable (contact the manufacturer of TranscendTM Technologies for more information).

3 Formic acid is mildly flammable with flashpoint of 68.9°C (156°F), lower flammability limit of 18.0% by volume, and NFPA flammability rating of 2.

Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on May 13, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.