Frequent Questions about the Environmental Education Grants Program

Find Text on this Page

You can search for words and phrases on this page by using your web browser's Find feature.

  • Press CTRL+F from your keyboard, or
  • Select the Find feature from your browser's menu

For most browsers, matches will be highlighted on the page so you can easily find them.

Updated February 23, 2024.

Below are questions and answers about the Environmental Education (EE) Grant Program for informational and explanatory purposes only. They are not meant to amend or change a published solicitation notice in any way. Please contact eegrants@epa.gov with additional questions about application procedures only. No questions will be taken regarding application content or ideas.

The 2023 Environmental Education grant competition closed on November 8, 2023.

We encourage you to subscribe to the EE Grants Listserv to stay up-to-date on all EPA Environmental Education grant information.

Information related to all solicitation notices

General Overview of the EPA EE Grant Program

How competitive is this grant program?

This grant program generates a great deal of public enthusiasm for developing environmental education projects. EPA receives many more applications for these grants than can be supported with available funds. In past competitions the ratio of grant awards to applications have been anywhere from 1/10 to 1/30.

Do you issue an Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) every year?

Our ability to publish a NOFO and fund EE grants is completely dependent on budget appropriations. If this program is approved for funding, we will run a competition each year. EPA also reserves the right to make additional awards under this announcement consistent with Agency policy and guidance if additional funding becomes available after the original selections are made. Any additional selections for awards will be made no later than 6 months after the original selection decisions. To stay up-to-date on all EPA Environmental Education grant information, we encourage you to subscribe to the EE Grants Listserv.

Can I talk to someone in EPA’s EE Grant Program about my idea for a grant project?

No. EPA staff are not permitted to discuss potential grant ideas with potential applicants, meet with individual applicants to discuss draft applications, provide informal comments on draft applications, or provide advice to applicants on how to respond to ranking criteria. The point of contact for the EE Grants Program may answer only technical questions that are not addressed in a current solicitation notice or in the FAQs.

Whom can I contact if I have technical questions that are not addressed in a current solicitation notice or in the FAQs?

Applicants may send any questions regarding threshold eligibility criteria and requests for clarification about the funding opportunity to EEgrants@epa.gov. Applicants should continue checking the list of FAQs as it is updated during the open period of a solicitation.

The EE Grants webpage also provides announcements of dates, times, links, and call-in numbers for webinars and conference call(s) that will be held by EPA's Office of Environmental Education (OEE). During these webinars OEE staff will discuss how to write a competitive application, clarify points in the open solicitations, and address commonly asked questions related to the current solicitation.

How can I find out about upcoming solicitation notices?

If you wish to be notified about upcoming solicitation notices, visit the main EE Grants webpage where you can subscribe to the EE Grants Listserv.. Subscribers to EPA's Office of Environmental Education listserv will receive news related to the EE Grants Program, including announcements related to the future competitions.

Can I see examples of previously funded projects in each Region, and by Headquarters?

Yes. The EE Grant homepage's  “Grants Awarded” tab contains a list and short descriptions of applications previously funded by this program.

Are there other EE grant programs that I can apply to?

Other available federal grant funding opportunities are listed on the federal site www.grants.gov

Eligibility

Who is eligible to apply for an EE Grant?

The following entities are ELIGIBILE to apply for a grant under this competition:

  • Local education agencies
  • College or universities
  • State education or environmental agencies
  • Nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(C)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
  • Tribal organizations that qualify as nonprofit organization described Section 501(C)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
  • Tribal education agencies (Tribal education agencies eligible to apply include schools or community colleges controlled by an Indian tribe, band or nation which is recognized as eligible for special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians, and which are not administered by the Bureau of Indian Education)  
  • Noncommercial educational broadcasting entity as defined and licensed by Federal  Communications Commission (FCC)

Additional eligibility considerations: Applicant organizations must be located in the United States, in U.S. territories, or in a freely associated state (Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau). Additionally, eligibility requirements apply to both “prime” recipients and all subrecipients.

The following entities are INELIGIBILE to receive an award:

  • For-profit organizations
  • Individual teachers, educators, or faculty members
  • Individual students
  • Individual citizens
  • Individual schools that are not nonprofit 501(C)(3)s  
  • Tribal education agencies that are administered by the Bureau of Indian Education
  • Nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engage in lobbying activities as defined in Section 3 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995

Applicants are encouraged to email EEGrants@epa.gov with eligibility (prime and subrecipient) related questions prior to the application deadline. 

Can the same organization apply for a grant as a prime recipient and be included in another grant application as a subrecipient for the same competition?

Yes. Applicants can apply for a grant, as a prime/lead, and also be included in another application as a subrecipient. See Section III (C) of the NOFO for full details on this grant program’s threshold eligibility criteria.

Can a for-profit company apply with an eligible fiscal sponsor?

No. All applicants and subrecipients must meet eligibility requirements outlined in Section III of the NOFO. An entity that is ineligible, such as a for-profit firm, cannot arrange for an eligible entity to apply on their behalf as a "fiscal sponsor."

Can an otherwise eligible “fiscal agent” or “fiscal sponsor” apply on behalf of an otherwise eligible entity, such as an incorporated nonprofit organization, that may lack the capacity to apply and/or manage a full EPA grant on their own?

No. Applicants for EPA funding apply on their own behalf and become the Recipient as that term is defined in 2 CFR 200.1. The fiscal agent or sponsor may provide a subaward to a lower-resourced incorporated nonprofit organization (subrecipient) acting as a Pass-through entity under 2 CFR 200.1 but as the “Recipient” the fiscal agent/sponsor remains accountable to EPA for the proper expenditure of EPA funds and effective programmatic performance. The pass-through entity is also accountable to EPA for the subrecipient’s compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements such as those governing competitive procurement. Refer to 2 CFR Part 25, 2 CFR 200.332 and EPA’s General Terms and Conditions implementing those regulatory requirements for details on pass-through entity responsibilities. Note that as indicated in Appendix A to the EPA Subaward Policy a passthrough entity may not provide a subaward to a non-profit organization to provide ancillary administrative services such as accounting or information technology for payroll operations. Subrecipients must carry out substantive parts of the EPA funded project consistent with the definition of Subaward and Subrecipient in 2 CFR 200.1.

Can an individual student or teacher apply for a grant to study environmental education?

No. Individual students, individual teachers or other individuals are not eligible to apply or receive funding under this grant program. 

Can an organization located in Canada or Mexico apply for a grant to do an environmental education project in the United States.?

No. An organization must be located in the United States, one of its territories , or a freely associated state (Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau) to be eligible to apply for a grant from this program.

Is an application eligible if the work of the project is proposed to take place outside of the United States?

Possibly, if the applicant organization is located in the United States or one of its territories, AND, the majority of educational activities in the program take place: (a) in the United States; (b) in the United States and Canada or Mexico; or (c) in U.S. Territories.

Is a 501 (c) (6) organization eligible to apply for an Environmental Education grant?

No. A non-profit organization must be designated as a 501 (c) (3) by the Internal Revenue Service to apply for an Environmental Education Grant.

Are local or county government agencies eligible to apply for a grant?

Yes. Local education agencies are eligible, as well as environmental agencies within local or county governments, as long as they can demonstrate they have the authority to conduct education programs. This authority can be demonstrated by providing documentation from the state department of education, referencing the law or bylaws that established the agency, quoting the current official mission statement, and/or showing proof that authority has been set by practice of education programs in the past. Be sure to include this information in a succinct statement within your application’s Work Plan as well as in the Programmatic Capability and Past Performance section of the application.

Are state government agencies eligible to apply for a grant?

Yes, as long as the state agency can prove it has the authority to conduct environmental education programs. This authority can be demonstrated by providing documentation from the state department of education, referencing the law or bylaws that established the agency, quoting the current official mission statement, and/or showing proof that authority has been set by practice of education programs in the past. Be sure to include this information in a succinct statement within your application’s Work Plan as well as in the Programmatic Capability and Past Performance section of the application.

How do I confirm if I qualify to apply to this grant competition as a local education agency? 

The NOFO states that "any local education agency... may submit an application." For purposes of this grant program the term "local education agency" is defined as a public board of education or other public authority legally constituted within a State for either administrative control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township, school district, or other political subdivision of a State, or of or for a combination of school districts or counties that is recognized in a State as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools or secondary schools. If there is any question as to whether you are a local education agency, you can check with the state department of education in the state in which you are located.

My tribe is interested in applying for an EE grant. We would apply as a Federally Recognized Tribe and our Environmental Department, which does educate the community, would be the administrator of the grant. I did not see the term “federally recognized tribe” under the eligibility section, but I did see tribal organizations could be eligible. Are we eligible to receive a grant?

“Tribal education agencies” that are eligible to apply include a school or community college which is controlled by an Indian tribe, band, or nation, which is recognized as eligible for special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians and which is not administered by the Bureau of Indian Education. Tribal organizations qualify if they meet that criteria or the non-profit criteria listed in Section III of the current solicitation notice. In addition, an environmental agency within a tribe would be eligible as long as they were not administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and could demonstrate they have the authority to conduct education programs. This authority can be demonstrated by providing documentation from the Tribe or the tribal department of education, referencing the law or bylaws that established the agency, quoting the current official mission statement, and/or showing proof that authority has been set by practice of education programs in the past. Be sure to include this information in a succinct statement in the Project Summary and in the Detailed Project Description, as well as in detail in the Programmatic Capability and Past Performance section of the application.

I represent a school administered by the Bureau of Indian Education. Are we eligible for an EE grant?

No. Per Section III of each solicitation notice: “Tribal education agencies that are eligible to apply include a school or community college which is controlled by an Indian tribe, band, or nation, which is recognized as eligible for special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians and which is not administered by the Bureau of Indian Education. Tribal organizations do not qualify unless they meet that criteria or the non-profit criteria (having 501(C)(3) status with the IRS).”

May an organization apply for 501(c)(3) status at the same time as they apply for a grant, or do they have to have the status approved before they submit their application to the EPA?

Yes. An organization may apply for 501(C)(3) status at the same time that they apply for a grant, but the organization must have its 501(C)(3) status ALREADY APPROVED by the IRS to be eligible for an award under this grant program. If an applicant becomes a finalist for a grant but does not have its 501(C)(3) status approved by the time of the award, it will not be eligible for the award.

We are part of a collaboration of 501(C)(3) non-profit environmental education centers. We run a residential EE program for school children. Can the EE grant funds be used to support residential EE programs conducted for elementary and middle school students?

Yes. As described, this sort of residential program would be eligible. If you intend to conduct your project as a collaboration of partners and want to apply for a grant under one of our solicitation notices, decide which one of you will be the applicant and “prime recipient”. Then be sure to get partnership letters of commitment from the other “centers”.

We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit that receives funds through grants and corporate contributions and then redistributes 100% of those funds for EE programs at school districts in our region of the country. Are we eligible for an EE grant?

Yes. If you are an eligible entity as defined in the current solicitation notice (501(c)(3) non-profits are eligible) and your proposed project is going to redistribute grant funds to eligible entities through subawards, your organization is eligible for an EE grant. You must, of course, adhere to the requirement that EXACTLY (no more and no less than) 25% of the funds you receive from EPA under an EE grant be awarded to eligible subrecipients in amounts of $5000 or less.

We are an educational 501(c)(3) and a religious-based school. Are we eligible to apply for a grant from your program, even though we are an educational institution founded on religious principles?

Yes. As a 501(c)(3) organization, you are eligible to apply for an EE grant. The religious aspect is irrelevant.

What do you mean by eligible subrecipients?

Subrecipients are organizations that receive a part of the grant funds awarded by EPA to a "Prime recipient" (prime) through a process determined by the Prime. The Prime selects the subrecipients, grants them the funds, and does all the follow up with them (i.e., EPA does not get involved in the subaward process). However, subrecipient organizations must be eligible to receive funds per the same rules of eligibility as specified in the current solicitation notice for the Prime recipients (see Section III of the NOFO for information on subrecipient eligibility requirements ).

Applicants are not required to list the names of their intended subrecipients in their application. If an applicant does not yet know which entities will receive subawards, they must outline the process and criteria that will be used for selecting eligible subrecipients. Review Section IV (E) - Content of Application Submission of the NOFO for additional information on this requirement.

My organization has never received an EE grant from EPA for a project that we’ve been running for several years. Would our project be eligible for funding from EPA?

Yes. Your project would be considered eligible for a grant through the EE program assuming that your organization meets all of the eligibility requirements as defined in the solicitation notice. The fact that the project already exists under non-EPA funding does not prevent it from being eligible for funding under the current EPA EE Program solicitation.

Can an organization who has an active EE grant or an organization that has previously been awarded an EE grant apply to the current NOFO?

Applicants can be funded in consecutive years or while they have an active EE grant with the EPA so long as the grant application is for a different project. According to Section III (C) - Threshold Eligibility Criteria of the NOFO, “Applicants must demonstrate that their application is for a project for which they (the applicant) have not been previously awarded a grant by EPA’s EE grant program by including a statement to this effect in the Project Summary; or the applicant must demonstrate that they are expanding, building on, enhancing, or otherwise modifying a project previously funded by EPA’s EE Grant Program.”  

What does the term “threshold eligibility criteria” mean, as used in the NOFO and must an applicant meet all threshold eligibility criteria to be considered eligible for a grant?

Threshold eligibility criteria are requirements that an applicant must meet in order for their application to be deemed eligible for consideration for a grant award – in this case for a grant award from the Environmental Education Grant Program. (See Section III of the current NOFO for the list of threshold eligibility criteria.)

Applicants must meet ALL threshold eligibility criteria listed in Section III (C) - Threshold Eligibility Criteria of the NOFO to be considered for funding under this grant program.  

Are there any activities that are ineligible for funding in this program?

Yes. Section III (D) - Ineligible Costs or Activities and Other Considerations of the NOFO lists costs and activities that are ineligible for funding in this program. According to this section of the NOFO, “If an application is submitted that includes any ineligible tasks or activities, that portion of the application will be ineligible for funding and may, depending on the extent to which it affects the application, render the entire application ineligible for funding. Eligible tasks and activities should be consistent with 20 U.S.C. § 5055(b), as well as the EPA General Terms and Conditions. Examples of ineligible tasks or activities include:

  • Technical training of environmental management professionals;
  • Environmental “information” and/or “outreach” projects that have no additional educational component, as described in Section I (C);
  • Advocacy promoting a particular point of view or course of action;
  • Lobbying or political activities as defined in 2 CFR Part 200.450;
  • Non-educational research and development;
  • Construction projects – EPA will not fund construction activities such as the acquisition of real property (e.g., buildings) or the construction or modification of any building; or
  • Union organizing”

If necessary, the EPA may clarify threshold eligibility issues with applicants prior to making an eligibility determination.

If my project includes ineligible activities, will my entire project be ineligible for funding?

If an application is submitted that includes any ineligible tasks or activities, that portion of the application will be ineligible for funding and may render the entire application ineligible for funding. If necessary, the EPA may clarify threshold eligibility issues with applicants prior to making an eligibility determination.

Would the installation of a rain garden or a playground that it built to instruct children how a certain environmental principle works be considered construction therefore ineligible for funding? 

The NOFO specifically prohibits using EPA funds for construction. The creation of something like a rain garden or a playground should be peripheral to an education project, not its main activity and not the major expense of the budget. This grant program doesn't allow the funds to be used, for example, for the construction of a building, even to hold environmental education classes or house environmental displays, etc. So if expenses to install a rain garden or playground dominate the budget and the project period, and require something like heavy equipment purchase or rental, then most likely the project is more construction than education and therefore ineligible. (Note: Sometimes this grant program has deemed the creation of such things as a nature trail or a bird house as allowable expenses, but even these must be part of a larger education project, not the primary focus of the project and/or expenditure of the budget.)

Who reviews my application for eligibility?

Applications to the EE Local Grants solicitation will be reviewed for threshold eligibility by a Regional EE Coordinator, designee in the EPA Region in which the proposed project will be located, or by staff in EPA's Office of Environmental Education.

If my application is deemed ineligible, when will I be notified?

Applicants deemed ineligible for funding consideration as a result of the threshold eligibility review will be notified via email within 15 calendar days of the ineligibility determination. Ineligibility determination emails will be sent to the to the original signer of the application (line #21 of the SF 424) and/or the project contacts listed in the Project Summary Cover Letter portion of the application.

EPA Priorities

What educational priorities does my project need to address in order to be eligible?

In order to be eligible for funding under this grant program all applicants must address at least one of the Educational Priorities listed in the NOFO. Applicants must also address one of the Environmental Priorities listed in the NOFO and specify a topic under the priority that the application will address to be considered eligible. Section I (E) - Educational and Environmental Priorities of the NOFO provides the full list of Educational Priorities, Environmental Priorities, and sample environmental topics for the current grant competition. 

Does EPA give any of the educational or environmental priorities a higher degree of importance or priority than any of the others?

No. None of the educational or environmental priorities listed in Section I (E) - Educational and Environmental Priorities of the NOFO are considered of higher importance or priority to EPA than any of the others.

How does this solicitation notice define environmental justice and can grantees conduct advocacy work as part of their projects?

For purposes of this solicitation, Environmental Justice (EJ) refers to activities increasing public awareness and knowledge that disproportionate and adverse environmental, human health, climate-related and other cumulative impacts are more likely to affect or have affected underserved communities. By learning about environmental justice and local environmental issues, program participants will enhance their ability to be meaningfully involved in future EJ discussions that affect their local environments.

This grant program does not fund advocacy work. Refer to Section III (D) - Ineligible Costs or Activities and Other Considerations of the NOFO for a complete list of this grant program’s ineligible costs and activities.

Do I need to address more than one educational priority or more than one environmental priority in my project?

No. Applicants are required to address at least one of the educational priorities and at least one of the environmental priorities listed in Section I (E) - Educational and Environmental Priorities of the NOFO. Addressing multiple educational and/or environmental priorities within a single application is not an eligibility requirement.  

Can I address more than one educational or environmental priority in my project and would this impact my evaluation score?

Yes. Applications may address more than one priority in each category of priorities (educational and environmental), but if more than one priority is addressed, then it is important that the application is clear which priority in each category is the focus of the project and why that focus was chosen for the proposed project. 

Applicants will not get any extra points for addressing more than one education and/or environmental priority in their application.

Does my application have to specifically describe how it will support one or more Strategic Goals of the EPA? If so, where do I find more information on these goals?

Yes. Applications must specifically reference one or more of EPA's Strategic Goals in the application and explain how the project will support the goal(s). Read more about EPA’s Strategic Goals in EPA's Strategic Plan.

Do community-focused stewardship activities need to focus on just teachers and/or students or could they include other community members?

Community members of any age could qualify as audience members in a project funded by this grant program—not just teachers and/or students.

Does this program fund the development of environmental education materials or curriculum?

EPA encourages applicants to use existing quality environmental education materials when available, rather than developing new ones, because many existing quality materials are under-utilized.

EPA will consider funding the development of new materials where the applicant demonstrates that there is a need (e.g., that existing quality educational materials cannot be adapted to a particular local environmental concern or audience or existing quality materials are not available). You should specify what steps you have taken to determine this need (e.g., you may cite a conference where this need was discussed, the results of inquiries made within your community or with educational institutions, or a research paper or other published document).

How do I evaluate and select high quality environmental education materials among the many existing choices that seem relevant to my project?

When determining what educational materials to use in your project EPA recommends you review Section VIII (B) – Additional Resources of the NOFO, specifically the Environmental Education (EE) Guidelines for Excellence’s Environmental Education Materials: Guidelines for Excellence. The EE Guidelines for Excellence were produced by the North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) with support from EPA. All EE Guidelines for Excellence can be downloaded free of charge. It is not necessary to purchase any of the individual guidelines unless you require a hard copy.   

If you don't know yet which materials you will use as part of your project, you should identify in your application what steps you will take to search for and select those materials.

Where can I find a resource on environmental educators, if I want my project to focus on environmental education teaching skills?

A resource to help guide projects that address environmental education teaching skills is the Professional Development of Environmental Educators, which is part of the Environmental Education (EE) Guidelines for Excellence. The EE Guidelines for Excellence were produced by the North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) with support from EPA. All EE Guidelines for Excellence can be downloaded free of charge. It is not necessary to purchase any of the individual guidelines unless you require a hard copy.   

Section VIII (B) – Additional Resources of the NOFO contains a link to the Environmental Education (EE) Guidelines for Excellence.

Can an EE grant be used for a program that targets primarily adults, with little or no K-12 component, such as a program to educate homeowners associations, civic groups and elected officials on local environmental issues?

Yes. EE grants can be used to provide environmental education to adults. EE grant projects can, but are not required to serve K-12 students as part of their target audience. 

How does EPA define “students”—e.g., are university students considered an eligible target audience?

Environmental information provides facts or opinions about environmental issues or problems. Information is essential to any educational effort. However, environmental information is not by itself EE. Information provides facts or opinions, whereas education teaches people how to think, analyze, and solve problems.

Definitions of Terms

How does the EE Grants Program define Environmental Education?

EPA’s EE Grants Program defines environmental education (EE) as activities that increase public awareness and knowledge about environmental and conservation issues and provide participants with the skills necessary to make informed decisions and to take responsible actions. EE is based on objective and scientifically-sound information and does not advocate a particular viewpoint or a particular course of action. EE teaches individuals how to weigh various sides of an issue through critical thinking, problem solving and decision making skills on environmental topics. EE covers the range of steps and activities from awareness to action with an ultimate goal of environmental stewardship. EE involves lifelong learning; its audiences are of all age groups, from very young children through senior citizens. EE can include both outdoor and in-classroom education, in both formal and informal settings.

How does the EE Grant Program define Environmental Information?

Environmental information provides facts or opinions about environmental issues or problems. Information is essential to any educational effort. However, environmental information is not, by itself, environmental education. Information provides facts or opinions whereas education teaches people how to think, analyze, and solve problems.

How does the EE Grant program define Environmental Outreach?

Environmental outreach disseminates information and sometimes asks audiences to take specific action, but doesn’t necessarily teach people how to analyze an issue. Outreach often presents a particular point of view, and often in pursuit of a particular goal. Examples may include a community meeting to inform residents about a toxic site in their area and where they can go for help, or a campaign to get volunteer participants for restoration of soil health or of a stream’s riparian zone.

How does this solicitation define Underserved Communities ?

For purposes of this competition and the evaluation of applications, “Underserved Communities” refers to one or more of the following:

  1. Identified as a disadvantaged community in the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) developed by the Council on Environmental Quality
  2. High-poverty Areas
  3. Persistent Poverty Counties
  4. Title 1 Schools

See Section I (C) – Key Definitions for additional information on this competition’s definition of underserved communities. Also, Appendix E – Identifying Underserved Communities of the NOFO provides instructions that detail the steps applicants can take to determine if they will be working in communities identified as disadvantaged by the Council on Environmental Quality’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), high-poverty areas, persistent poverty counties, and/or in Title I Schools. The instructions in this section of the NOFO are intended to serve as a reference and applicants are welcome to use other sources of data when completing the Community Description section of their Detailed Project Description.

Can my project focus on environmental information and outreach?

No. All EE grant projects must satisfy the definition of “environmental education” as defined in Section I (C) of the NOFO. Environmental education may include environmental information and outreach, but these activities alone, or as the main focus of the project, do not qualify as environmental education. Environmental education fosters critical thinking, problem solving and decision-making skills on environmental topics. Environmental education covers the range of steps and activities from awareness to action with an ultimate goal of environmental stewardship. Environmental information simply provides facts and outreach provides direct contact, personalized messaging and activities about a specific topic. Information and outreach are valuable tools, but are used for different purposes than education. Applicants must demonstrate how their project will reflect the components of environmental education as defined in Section I (C) of the NOFO.

What is the difference between outputs and outcomes of a project?

Outputs are tangible products developed during the life of the grant, such as lesson plans, workshops, websites, field trips, stewardship activities, etc. Outcomes are non-tangible results achieved by implementing the outputs, such as a better understanding of an environmental topic, or an attitude change, or a commitment to long term stewardship. See Section I (G) and Appendix G in the NOFO for additional information on the differences between outputs and outcomes.  

What is the difference between a short-term output and a short-term outcome?

A short-term output is an activity, effort or work product, such as training sessions for formal and informal educators or development of educational materials and websites that can be measured qualitatively or quantitatively during the funded period. A short-term outcome is a result, effect or consequence that will occur from carrying out the outputs of the environmental education project during the project period. Short-term outcomes may include changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes, and motivation, as well as immediate benefits to the environment. See Section I (G) and Appendix G in the NOFO for examples of short-term outputs and a short-term outcomes.  

Roles of the Prime, Partners, Contractors and Subrecipients

What is a "prime" recipient?

The prime recipient is the organization that applies for and receives a grant directly from EPA. The prime recipient is responsible for determining the goals and of the project and how they will be accomplished, deciding how the subrecipients will be selected, including the assurance that all subrecipients are deemed eligible according to the solicitation notice, and ensuring that the project meets its goals within the timeframe and budget proposed.

What is a "partner"?

A partner is an organization (or for-profit company) that makes a commitment to join the applicant (the prime) in the design and/or implementation of the proposed project by providing funds and/or services integral to the accomplishment of the project’s goals. Usually a partnering organization (or company) has similar organizational goals to the prime/applicant and/or experience/expertise needed in the project. Applicants may work with one or more partners to develop, design and implement proposed projects. If an entity designated in the application as a partner is not involved in the development, design or implementation of the project and/or does not provide a letter of commitment, then it is not a true partner according to the EPA EE Grant Program. See Section (I) of the NOFO for additional information about partnerships.  

What is the difference between a "partner" and a "subrecipient"?

The EE Grants Program considers a partner to be an organization that makes a commitment to join the applicant (the prime) in the design and/or implementation of the proposed project by providing funds and/or services integral to the accomplishment of the project’s goals. The prime may partner with an organization to help achieve the required minimum 25% (of the total budget) match; i.e., the partner is providing cash or donating time and services. The prime may also partner with an organization for their experience or expertise. Partners and primes have mutual interests and are both committed to the success of the project, but the prime recipient is responsible for accomplishing the goals of the project within the timeframe and budget proposed in the original grant application. A partner cannot receive a subaward unless the partner is an eligible entity as defined in Section III of the solicitation notice.

Subrecipients receive an award from the prime recipient to perform tasks integral to the project’s goals, as outlined by the prime. Subrecipients are selected by the prime and must be eligible entities as outlined in the NOFO (Section III). They are often the local level community-based organizations with audiences proposed to be reached by a project. One example would be for the prime recipient to award subawards to school districts to carry out activities proposed in the work plan.

What is the difference between a “subrecipient” and a “contractor”?

A subrecipient is an eligible organization (as defined by the solicitation notice) that receives an award from the prime recipient to perform tasks integral to the project’s goals, as outlined by the prime. The subrecipients are often local level community-based organizations with audiences proposed to be reached by a project. One example would be for the prime recipient to award subawards to school districts to carry out activities proposed in the work plan.

A contractor is an individual, organization, or for-profit company that receives money from a prime recipient, subrecipient, or partner to provide goods or services (work tasks) considered non-integral or non-substantive to the project’s goals. The person or organization performing the evaluation of the project is often a contractor, as is a company providing buses for field trips, for example. All contracts above the micro-purchase threshold must be competed.

Do you have a graphic that summarizes the roles and responsibilities of a prime recipient, a partner, a subrecipient and a contractor?

  Must be eligible as defined in Section III of the solicitation notice Can provide match Can receive sub awards Must compete to receive award Performs work integral to grant project Performs Tasks non- integral or non-substantive to project
Partner   x x (if an eligible entity)   x  
Subrecipient x x x   x  
Contractor   x   x*   x
Prime Recipient x x   x x  

*If contact is in excess of the micro-purchase threshold which is currently $10,000 for most recipients.

Is there a threshold amount where grantees are required to compete their contracts?

Yes. Recipients must compete procurement contracts in excess of the 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) micro-purchase threshold which is currently $10,000 for most recipients.  Please refer to the Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements for additional information on competition requirements for EPA grants.

If we partner with an external professional evaluator would that be considered a contract or subaward and count towards the 25% subaward requirement?

Generally, an external evaluator needs to have some objectivity, and therefore would not be in a position to be a partner in the project they are evaluating. Usually an external evaluator is hired for their services, and this would be considered a contractual arrangement, not a subaward. A contract would not be able to be counted toward the 25% requirement for subawards, even if it is for an amount of $5000 or less.

May an applicant use a contractor’s services to perform work on part of the proposed project?

Yes. The applicant may hire a contractor for part of the work of the project as long as all federal rules and procedures (or state rules, if the applicant is a state agency) for procurement are followed. EPA’s Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements guide describes the financial transactions covered by the competitive contracting requirements and other rules EPA grantees must follow when awarding and administering EPA funded contracts.  

Under this grant program, may a for-profit company be included as a partner?

Yes. A for-profit company may be included as a partner as long as the grantee (prime recipient) does not enter the partnership with the intent to hire the for-profit company to provide goods or services that are available in the commercial marketplace in order to obtain those goods and services in a non-competitive transaction. See Section I (I) – Partnerships of the NOFO for additional information on this grant program’s partnership guidance.  

Can project partners be located outside of the United States, U.S. Territories, or freely associated states?

Partners do not have to meet the same eligibility requirements as prime and subrecipients. Please refer to Section I (I) of the NOFO for more information on Partnerships. It is important to note that in this context, partners are not receiving part of the grant award. If the recipient desired to contract with the partner, any procurement must comply with applicable EPA policies. Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements [Updated November 2022 (pdf).

May an applicant contract with a non-profit organization to do work on a proposed project?

Yes. Work on a proposed project may be contracted out to a non-profit organization as long as all federal rules and procedures (or state rules, if the applicant is a state agency) for procurement are followed.

Can for-profit partners receive federal funds as part of this grant program?

Yes, but only if the transaction complies with requirements for competitive procurement in the Procurement Standards of 2 CFR Part 200.  Purchases of instructional, curriculum development, project management, IT, consulting, and similar commercial services in excess of the 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1) micro-purchase level ($10,000 for most recipients) must be competed. Also, micro-purchases must be equitably distributed among qualified sources as required by the regulation. EPA’s position, as reflected in the Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements, is that recipients must obtain competitive quotes or bids from at least 3 qualified sources when the amount of the contract exceeds the micro-purchase threshold.

May a partner or contractor provide any or all of the required minimum 25% non-federal match?

Yes. A partner or contractor may provide any or all of the required minimum 25% non-federal match provided the costs they are covering are allowable for third party contributions under grant regulations. Contributions to matching funds may include cash, volunteer services, and donated supplies and equipment. Please note that a third party’s indirect costs may not be counted toward a cost share.

What are you looking for in the Partnership Letters of Commitment?

The letter the partner writes to verify their partnership must clearly state how they are to be involved in the development, design or implementation of the project. It is very important that partners provide letters that clearly describe the role they will play in the proposed project. If funds, equipment/supplies or in-kind services will be provided, the dollar amounts or specific equipment/supplies or kinds of services need to be described specifically and in detail in the letter.

Applications will be evaluated on their use of partnerships to develop, design, and implement their project, as described in Section V of the NOFO. It is not enough to simply name partners in the application. All partners must provide letters of commitment or they will not be given consideration by reviewers. If no letters are provided, it will be assumed there are no partners for the project.

To whom should our partners address their letters of commitment?

The Regional Environmental Education (EE) Coordinator. The EPA Contacts for EE Grants website contains a list of all Regional EE Coordinators

Are applicants required to include partnership letters of commitment from subrecipients in their application package?

Partnership letters of commitment are only required from project partners, as defined in Section I (I) of the NOFO. The only reason a subrecipient would write a partnership letter of commitment is if that subrecipient is also considered a partner.  Subrecipients that are not project partners should not write and submit partnership letters of commitment.

Do I need recommendation or endorsement letters in my application in order to be considered?

No. Only submit letters from partner organizations making a commitment to the project. Please do not submit letters that simply recommend or endorse the project. Only letters of commitment from a partner organization, if applicable, will be considered in evaluating application.

Do we have to have a partner for our proposed project?

No. Applicants are not required to form partnerships for a proposed project to receive a grant from this program. However, it is important to note that EPA’s EE Grants Program considers partnerships to be a valuable contribution to the success of most projects. Section V (A) of the NOFO details this competition’s evaluation criteria.

If you do not have any partners for your project, be sure to explain in your application how you anticipate reaching your goals successfully on your own.

Does my project have to include a subaward program?

Yes. Each project must include a subaward program and a description of how the applicant plans on using the subaward program to achieve its project goals, and how it plans to ensure that EXACTLY (no more than, no less than) 25% of the EPA funds awarded will be used for subawards of $5000 or less to eligible subrecipients. Applications must also explain how the prime recipient will select the subrecipients and monitor the subrecipients' activities, materials, and delivery methods to ensure that they contribute to the project's expected outputs and outcomes and are in alignment with its educational and environment priorities. See Section III (B) – Subaward and Non-Federal Match (Cost Share) Requirements of the NOFO for additional information on this grant program’s subaward requirements.

How much of the funds awarded to the prime recipient (grantee) must go toward subawards?

Each recipient (the prime recipient) of a grant under this solicitation will be required to award EXACTLY (no more and no less than) 25% of the funds received from EPA to eligible subrecipient in the form of subawards of $5000 or less.

Would the prime recipient (EPA EE Grant recipient) be allowed to award subawards for more than $5000 with either EPA funds or with their own matching funds?

Yes. Subawards in amounts of more than $5000 may be awarded with either EPA funds or matching funds, but those subawards will not count as one of the $5000 or less subawards required to be awarded with the EPA funds the prime recipient receives in an EE grant.

Would the prime recipient be allowed to award BOTH a subaward for $5000 or less from EPA funds AND a subaward for more than $5000 from EPA funds to the same subrecipient?

Generally not. Awarding subawards that total more than $5000 to one organization designated as a subrecipient in the project's $5000 or less subaward program in most cases would violate the requirement of the National Environmental Education Act. There may be cases, however, in which one entity may receive more than one subaward and still have one or more of those $5000 or less subawards count toward the required 25% subaward program as long as the prime recipient can demonstrate that each subaward is for a distinctly separate and different task fulfilling different goals or objectives of the project.

Would the prime recipient be allowed to award BOTH a subaward for $5000 or less from EPA funds AND another subaward (of any amount) from their OWN funds (i.e., funds from a source other than the EPA EE grant) to the same subrecipient to do work on the EPA grant?

Yes. But subawards awarded with a prime recipient’s own funds, no matter what the amount is, would not count toward the requirement to use 25% of EPA funds for subawards of $5000 or less.

We are planning a two year project. If we award a subaward to an organization for $5000 as part of the required $5000 or less subaward program the first year of our project, can we then give the same organization another subaward from EPA funds the second year for $5000 or less?

Once the prime has designated an organization as a subrecipient in the project’s required subaward program (in which exactly 25% of EPA funds must be expended on subawards of $5000 or less), then generally a maximum of $5000 in EPA funds can be awarded in subaward(s) to that organization, regardless of the project’s duration. For example, if a prime were to give a $3000 subaward from EPA funds to organization X the first year of a two-year project and $2000 the second year, the $5000 or less requirement will have been met. If organization X were to receive a subaward from EPA funds the second year for more than $2000 (e.g., $2500), then the $5000 limit will have been exceeded, which violates the terms of the agreement with the EE Grant Program, unless the prime recipient can demonstrate that each subaward is for a distinctly separate and different task fulfilling different goals or objectives of the project.

If awarded the grant, am I responsible for ensuring the awardees of the subawards are eligible for funds?

Yes. The prime recipient of the grant funds must ensure that all subawards they award with funds from this program go to entities that would qualify as "eligible applicants." Please note, subaward recipients are subject to the same eligibility requirements as “prime” recipients. Full details on this grant program’s eligibility requirements can be found in Section III of the solicitation notice.

We are a university that is considering applying for an EE grant. Can we make subawards internally within the university?

Sometimes, depending on how a university’s system is set up. Such situations will be decided on a case-by-case basis. Universities that are considering applying as a prime recipient and awarding subawards to sub-recipients within their university should contact EEGrants@EPA.gov and explain their particular situation before submitting an application.

When I apply do I need to know and have outlined in the application (or complete application for selected finalists) which entities or organizations will receive subawards?

No. The applicant does not have to know to whom they will be awarding subawards at the time they submit their proposal/or complete application for selected finalists. However, applicants that do not name specific subrecipients in their Word Plan must outline the process and criteria that will be used for selecting the subrecipients.

Do I have to make the subrecipients compete for the subawards?

No. EPA does not require the prime to run a competition for the subawards.

Our organization is made up of affiliate chapters. Could we give subawards to our chapters to implement our project?

An applicant can make subawards of $5000 or less to their chapters to implement the project, assuming that the chapters are set up as separate entities from the main organization and are eligible entities as defined in Section III of the NOFO.

Application Process

Where can I find the application deadline?

The Key Dates section of the NOFO contains the application deadline Information. This information can be found on the first page of the NOFO.  

If the application is submitted late, will the application be reviewed?

No. Applications submitted to grants.gov after the submission deadline (or hand delivered or postmarked after the deadline, if an applicant has been granted an exception) will be considered late and given no further consideration unless the applicant can clearly demonstrate that it was late due to EPA mishandling or because of technical problems associated with Grants.gov. If you experience technical issues with submitting your grant via grants.gov please refer to Section IV (C) - Technical Issues with Submission of the NOFO for additional guidance.  

How do I apply electronically using grants.gov?

To begin the application process under this grant announcement, go to Grants.gov and click the red “Apply” button at the top of the view grant opportunity page associated with this opportunity. 

The electronic submission of your application to this funding opportunity must be made by an official representative of your organization who is registered with Grants.gov and is authorized to sign applications for Federal financial assistance. If the submit button is grayed out, it may be because you do not have the appropriate role to submit in your organization. Contact your organization’s EBiz point of contact or contact Grants.gov for assistance at 1-800-518-4726 or support@grants.gov.

 Applicants need to ensure that the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) who submits the application through Grants.gov and whose UEI is listed on the application is an AOR for the applicant listed on the application. Additionally, the UEI listed on the application must be registered to the applicant organization's SAM.gov account. If not, the application may be deemed ineligible.

Applicants should follow the instructions given in Section IV (B) – Submission Instructions of the NOFO for guidance on how to submit a complete and accurate application. Applications must be submitted electronically through www.grants.gov.  

If your organization has no access to internet or access is very limited, you may request an exception to this requirement. Hard copy applications are only accepted if the applicant follows the procedures listed in Section IV (A) – Requirement to Submit through Grants.gov and Limited Exception Procedures of the NOFO. Additional guidance on how to request an exception can be found here.

How do I register for www.grants.gov?

Please read the Grants.gov Applicant Registration instructions for guidance on how to register for grants.gov. Please note that organizations applying to this funding opportunity must have an active Grants.gov registration, which is FREE.

Please note that in order to apply for this funding opportunity through Grants.gov, your organization must be registered with the U.S Government through its System for Award Management (SAM.gov) and obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). This process could take a month or more for new registrants. Applicants must ensure that all registration requirements are met in order to apply for this opportunity through Grants.gov and should ensure that all such requirements have been met well in advance of the application deadline. Contact Grants.gov for assistance at 1-800-518-4726 or support@grants.gov to resolve technical issues with Grants.gov. Applicants who are outside the U.S. at the time of submittal and are not able to access the toll-free number may reach a Grants.gov representative by calling 606-545-5035. The Grants.gov Support Center is available 24 hours a day 7 days a week, excluding federal holidays.

Whom should I contact if I am having problems with grants.gov?

Grants.gov is a federal government-wide database; it is not an EPA database. If you are having any problems uploading your application materials or any other such problems with grants.gov, you will need to contact the system administrator. Call Grants.gov for assistance at 1-800-518-4726 or email questions to support@grants.gov. Please DO NOT CALL EPA with questions about grants.gov.

Can I email my application?

No. Email submittals of applications are not accepted for the EE Grant Program. Electronic applications must be submitted through Grants.gov. Review Section  IV – Application and Submission Information of the NOFO for detailed information this competition’s application submission instructions.

Application Forms and Instructions

Can I submit more than one application under this solicitation?

Yes. Applicants can submit more than one application under this solicitation so long as each one is for a different project and is separately submitted.

What forms and documents are required to be submitted for the EE Grant Program?

The following forms and documents are required to be submitted when applying for a grant in this program (please use the guidelines in Sections IV and V of the solicitation notice when preparing each of these):

  1. Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) - Refer to Appendix B in the NOFO for additional instructions.
  2. Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs (SF-424A) - Refer to Appendix B in the NOFO for additional instructions.
  3. EPA Key Contacts Form 5700-54
  4. EPA Form 4700-4 Preaward Compliance Review Report (Please see these Useful Tips for completing this form)
  5. Project Narrative
    1. Work Plan (Not to exceed 10 single-spaced pages total)
      • Project Summary Cover Letter (Maximum of two-page)
      • Detailed Project Description
    2. Attachments (While there is no page limit for the attachments, typically the range is 10-12 total pages for all attachments)
      • Attachment A: Detailed Budget Table and Narrative
      • Attachment B: Timeline and Milestones
      • Attachment C: Logic Model
      • Attachment D: Programmatic Capability and Past Performance
      • Attachment E: Partnership Letters of Commitment

Does EPA have a website where applicants can locate and download all of this grant program’s required federal forms?  

Yes. The EPA Grantee Forms website contains downloadable versions of the SF-424, SF-424A, EPA Form 5700-54, and EPA Form 4700-4.

Is there a limit to the number of attachments applicants can use when submitting the Project Narrative portion of their application?

It is strongly advised that applicants combine their files into no more than 6 attachments when submitting applications via Grants.gov. Trying to upload a large number of individual files leaves room for error in the uploading and downloading process. PDFs are preferred when possible. Trying to upload a large number of individual files leaves room for error in the uploading and downloading process.

Are there resources like models and templates available to help applicants with the application process?

Yes. Our Helpful Resources for Applying webpage contains a number of optional templates and other resources designed to help applicants. On this page you will find an application checklist, a Work Plan template, a Logic Model template, a Detailed Budget Table template, a Timeline template, and a Community Description template. All templates on this site can be downloaded as Microsoft Word documents. Please note that the models and templates on this site are intended to serve as references and applicants are not required to use them.

Is there an example Logic Model available?

Yes. An example of a basic logic model with broad outputs and outcomes can be found in Appendix G of the NOFO. A template that you can use to create your own specific version of a Logic Model that complements your project can be downloaded on the Helpful Resources for Applying webpage.

Does EPA have any resources or trainings on detailed budget table and narrative development?

Prior to developing your Detailed Budget Table and Narrative please review EPA’s Interim General Budget Development Guidance for Applicants and Recipients of EPA Financial Assistance, EPA’s Developing a Budget Webinar, and EPA’s How to Develop a Budget online training courses.

Is there a limit to the number of resumes and the length of any resumes submitted to demonstrate our programmatic capability?

Yes. Only 3 one-page resumes should be included with the application.

Is there a page limit for the Work Plan?

Yes. The portion of the Narrative Application referred to as the Work Plan (which includes the Project Summary Cover Letter and the Detailed Project Description) shall not exceed 10 single-spaced pages. Pages in excess of the page limit will not be reviewed. “One page” refers to one side of a single-spaced typed page. The pages must be letter-sized (8 ½ X 11 inches), 12-point Times New Roman font, with one column per page with 1-inch margins on all sides. In addition, do not send extra material, such as videos, newspaper articles, etc.—they will not be reviewed.

Do the Attachments (A-E) count towards the 10 page Work Plan limit?

No. Attachments A-E (i.e., the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative, Timeline and Milestones, Logic Model, Programmatic Capability and Past Performance, and Partnership Letters of Commitment) - are not included in the 10-page Work Plan limit. While there is no page limit for the attachments, typically the range is 10-12 total pages for all attachments. However, all attachment pages of an application will be reviewed regardless of whether they fall into the typical page range.

Can I reorder the format of my application from the outline provided?

It is strongly advised that applicants organize their applications in the order presented in Section IV (E) – Content of Application Submission of the NOFO and limit the number of attachments associated with the required Project Narrative (Work Plan and Attachments) to no more than 6 when submitting an application via grants.gov.

Where do I identify Congressional Districts affected by my project?

To identify the appropriate Congressional District, go to www.house.gov.

How can applicants demonstrate one or more of the communities and populations their projects aim to serve meet this grant program’s definition of underserved communities and does EPA have resources  applicants can use to organize this information within the application?

Appendix E – Identifying Underserved Communities in the NOFO provides step-by-step instructions that applicants can take to determine if they will be working with underserved communities. Please note the websites and instructions detailed in Appendix E of the NOFO are only intended to serve as a reference. Applicants are welcome to use other sources of data when completing the Community Description section of their Detailed Project Description and should cite sources and studies, where appropriate. Citations and lists of sources may be submitted as a separate attachment and do not count toward the Work Plan’s 10 page limit.  

Appendix E – Identifying Underserved Communities of the NOFO also contains a Community Description Template that serves as an example of how applicants can organize/present this information within their applications. A downloadable version of the Community Description Template is available on our Helpful Resources for Applying website.

Are applicants required to cite the sources throughout their applications? 

Yes. Applicants should cite sources and studies, where appropriate. 

Please note that citations and lists of sources may be submitted as a separate attachment and do not count toward the Work Plan's 10-page limit.

Where can I find instructions for filling out SF-424- Application for Federal Assistance, the SF-424 A- Budget, and other forms required for this application?

There are instructions for filling out the SF-424, the SF-424 A, and other forms required to be submitted with your application in Appendix B of the NOFO and on the grants.gov website.

Are prime applicants required to fill out the EPA Form 47004, even if the prime applicant is a small organization that may not have a Civil Rights Coordinator?

All entities submitting applications under this solicitation notice must complete the EPA Form 47004, which collects information that enables EPA to determine whether applicants are developing projects, programs, and activities on a non-discriminatory basis. There are no exceptions. Please note that some of the questions on this form only apply to applicants that have 15 or more employees and applicants are not approved or disapproved based on the review of the Form 4700-4. We suggest applicants review the Tips for Completing EPA Form 4700-4 website prior to completing this required form.

What details of the project must the Work Plan include?

The 10-page Work Plan must include the Project Summary Cover Letter and the Detailed Project Description. Applicants must ensure that the Work Plan addresses the evaluation criteria in Section V (A) of the NOFO. Each Work Plan should be organized in the order and with the headings and information detailed in Section IV (E) – Content of Application Submission of the NOFO. Applicants may, but are not required to use the Optional Work Plan Template included in Appendix C and on the Helpful Resources for Applying website. Applicants that do not use the template will not be penalized.

Can I reorder paragraphs within the subsections of the Detailed Project Description?

It is strongly advised that applicants organize the Detailed Project Description section of their applications in the  applications in the order presented in Section IV (E) – Content of Application Submission of the NOFO, including the headings as given. Applicants may, but are not required to use the Optional Work Plan Template included in Appendix C and on the Helpful Resources for Applying website. Applicants that do not use the template will not be penalized.

If I have previously received federal funding from the EPA's EE Grant Program should I include that in my application?

Yes. In the Project Summary Cover Letter section of your Work Plan, please note any projects previously funded by the EPA's EE Grant Program, You will also need to provide additional details about any previously funded EE grants you have received in within the last three years in the Programmatic Capability and Past Performance portion of your application. All these previously funded grants should be labeled as "EPA EE Grants" in the Past Performance section of your application.

Do you have any additional suggestions of what to do to maximize the effectiveness of our application?

In addition to reading and following the instructions in the solicitation notice very carefully, we suggest that you perform an internal and/or external review on the application for clarity and conciseness. We recommend that you check the application for typographical, grammatical, and mathematical errors and perform a final quality control check to ensure that all application materials are complete and signed, and that the copies are legible. Applicants can also use the Application Checklist on our Helpful Resources for Applying website as a tool to help organize their application and to assist them in submitting a complete and accurate application. This checklist is not required and does not need to be included with the application.

When and how will I be notified about the status of my application?

Regarding eligibility determination:
Applicants will be notified of ineligibility status within 15 days ineligibility of the determination. Notification will be made via email and will be sent to the original signer of the application (line #21 of the SF 424) and/or the project contacts listed in the Project Summary Cover Letter portion of the application.

Regarding selection or non-selection for a grant award:EPA anticipates notifying eligible applicants of their selection or non-selection for a grant award to be made in March 2024. EPA anticipates notification to will be made via email by one of the agency contacts listed in Section VII of the NOFO. The notification will be sent to the original signer of the application (line #21 of the SF 424) and/or the project contacts listed in the Project Summary Cover Letter portion of the application.

Cost Requirements and Uses of Grant Funds

Are we required to use part of the funding we receive from the EPA EE Grants Program for subawards?

Yes. All applicants for grants are required to propose to award EXACTLY 25% (no more and no less) of the dollar request from EPA in the form of subawards of $5000 or less (See FAQs on the Roles of the Prime, Partners, Contractors, and Subrecipient). Since the National Environmental Education Act requires that exactly 25% of the EE grants budget be spent on awards of $5000 or less, EPA’s EE Grant Program is very strict about this amount being EXACT in the applicant’s proposed budget and in any prime recipient’s enacted budget.

Do the subawards have to be in the form of cash or can we award educational materials that we purchase and distribute?

Yes. The subaward must be a cash award. You may not use education materials that you have purchased as the subaward in place of a cash award.

What are fixed amount subawards?

As indicated in the definition Fixed amount award at 2 CFR 200.1, a fixed amount subaward is a type of subaward agreement in which the pass-through entity (aka the “Prime Grantee) provides a specific level of support without regard to actual costs incurred under the subaward. Accountability is based primarily on performance and results. See §§ 200.102(c), 200.201(b), and 200.333. Examples of potential fixed amount subawards include agreements to develop Environmental Education curricula in which subrecipients receive funding on a milestone basis, unit priced training classes for teachers or students, and lump sum support for community outreach meetings. Subrecipients must provide documentation of completion of specified deliverables to receive Subaward payments. However, detailed cost accounting records are not required. EPA provides guidance on fixed amount Subawards in section 9.0 of the Agency’s Subaward Policy and section E of EPA’s Subaward Frequent Questions.

Can applicants propose to meet the requirement for expending 25% of the amount of their EPA Environmental Education Act grant for subawards of $5,000 or less through fixed amount subawards?

Yes.

How can applicants indicate they would like to use fixed amount subawards?

Applicants should indicate whether they will seek EPA approval to use fixed amount subawards to meet all or part of the requirement to expend 25% of the amount of the EPA Environmental Education Grant through fixed amount subawards in the Project Summary Cover Letter part of their Work Plan. Applicants should also include a brief description of the types of subrecipient activities that will be funded on a fixed amount basis and identify anticipated deliverables and payment schedules in their Work Plan. For example, an applicant may propose to use fixed amount subawards for teacher training courses. The applicant would pay the subrecipient 25% of the amount of the subaward upon receipt of an acceptable curriculum and the remaining 75% based on documentation that a minimum number of teachers received the training.

Are fixed amount subawards exempt from all Federal requirements?

No. While EPA may waive certain regulatory requirements applicable to subawards (e.g. Cost accounting records required by 2 CFR 200.302, personnel compensation records required by 2 CFR 200.430) statutory requirements such as subrecipient compliance with the Civil Rights Laws when carrying out EPA funded activities continue to apply. EPA also will not waive provisions describing unallowable costs in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E such as those at 2 CFR 200.423 for alcoholic beverages.

Can the pass-through entity use subrecipient or third-party contributions to fixed amount subawards be used to meet the 25% cost share requirement for Environmental Education grants?

No. Because there are no accounting records required for fixed amount subawards if the subrecipient or a third party pays all or part of the cost of a fixed amount subaward those costs may not be counted towards cost share. See, 2 CFR 200.201(b)(2). However, as indicated in Question Q. E. 2 of EPA’s Subaward Frequent Questions pass-through entities may use other expenses to meet their cost share obligation such as:

  • Using its own funds for a portion of the fixed amount award provided the payments to the subrecipient are recorded in the pass-through entities ‘accounting system as cost share. 

  • Personnel or contractor costs for overseeing subrecipient performance. 

  • Costs incurred for other allowable activities that the pass-through entity performs directly.

Can a subrecipient use their subaward funding to pay for scholarships or travel?

Yes. Subawards can be used toward scholarships, transportation of students, stipends for educators as participant support costs under 2 CFR 200.456 or scholarships under 2 CFR 200.466 as long as these activities are integral to the EE project’s goals and with prior EPA approval. EPA approval may be provided at time of award if the pass-through entity (“prime recipient”) indicates in the budget narrative that subrecipients will use subaward funds for these purposes or post-award in response to a written request to EPA’s Grants Management Officer from the pass-through entity. Subrecipients should maintain accounting records (e.g. receipts) to document participant support cost payments. Refer to EPA Guidance on Participant Support Costs for additional information.

Is there a cost sharing (match) requirement for this grant program?

Yes. There is a cost share (match) requirement for the EE Grant Program. Applicants must demonstrate how they will provide non-federal funding matching funds of at least 25% of the TOTAL cost of the project. See Section III (B) – Subaward and Non-Federal Match (Cost Share) Requirements of the NOFO for additional guidance on this grant program’s cost share requirement. Also note that EE Grant Calculator (on right side of webpage) can be used as a tool to confirm your subaward and non-federal match calculations. Applicant may propose more than the required 25% match if they choose but should keep in mind that whatever dollar amount an applicant gives in an application as the matching funds will be the amount they are obligated to provide during the life of the grant.

The matching funds cannot be from a federal source (e.g., from another federal grant). The funds can be either in cash or in-kind services (e.g., volunteer hours), and can be from the applicant or from partner(s).

Will EPA waive the 25% cost share requirement for Environmental Education Local grants that are awarded to Insular Areas?

Yes. As provided in the Omnibus Territories Act, 48 U.S.C. 1469a, EPA waives cost share requirement for all EPA grants to Insular Areas when the cumulative amount of cost share is less than $200,000 over the life of the grant. Insular Areas as defined in the statute include the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianna Islands. EPA interprets the waiver authority to encompass agencies and instrumentalities of these governments as provided in the definition of State in 2 CFR 200.1. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is not an Insular Area for the purposes of 48 U.S.C. 1469a. For the Environmental Education Local grants that will be awarded under EPA EE-21-01 the maximum amount of direct EPA funding is $100,000 for the entire period of performance and the required cost share is 25% of total project costs. Therefore, the cumulative amount of the cost share is less than $200,000 and will be waived if an Insular Area’s application for funding is successful.  

In the application do I need to state where the non-federal matching funds for my project will come from?

Yes. Applicants must demonstrate how the applicant will meet the match requirement in the application in order to be eligible for funding consideration.

Are salaries allowed as matching funds? Is there any limit to the percentage of requested grant funds that can be used for salaries? Is there a specific way that salaries need to be stated in the matching funds section?

Yes. Salaries can be used as a match and there is no set limit. It is suggested you be as specific and detailed in the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative as possible when describing the salaries being covered by matching funds or being requested to be covered by grant funds – e.g., give the name(s) and title(s) of the person(s) whose salary is being listed, plus their normal salary and the percentage of their time being spent on the project. Be reasonable in your requests for personnel costs, as well as travel and overhead expenses, so your budget is competitive. Explain clearly in your Work Plan why and how the persons whose salaries are in the budget will be employed on the project. Instructions for creating your Detailed Budget Table and Narrative as well as a Detailed Budget Table and Narrative example and template can be found in Appendix D: Detailed Budget Table and Narrative of the NOFO.

We are currently administering a federal grant where we have cited some salary line items as part of our match requirement for that grant. Is it acceptable to use those salary funds on this grant as a portion of required match as well?

Any eligible, allocable costs can be used as match. See Section III (B) of the Current NOFO and our FAQ website for additional information on this grant program’s non-federal match requirements. It is important to note that if the other grant in question is a federal grant, then this would not be allowable because the match must come from a non-federal source.

Additionally, you cannot charge two grants for the same thing, so you can’t use the same thing as match in both grants (i.e., “double dipping”). As long as you aren’t charging the grants for the same thing or time worked it shouldn’t be an issue. You can work on multiple grants at once as long as it doesn’t overlap. For example, if someone was working on two different grants at 50% each FTE and nothing more, that would be allowable.

Do the required matching funds have to be in cash, or can they be in-kind donations and services, e.g., a volunteer’s or teacher’s time working on the project?

Either is acceptable. In-kind contributions of services, and other items like equipment, can count toward the required 25% cost match. Please see Section III(B) of the solicitation notice for a complete matching funds explanation. As explained in the solicitation notice, the match must be for an allowable cost and may be provided by the applicant or a partner organization or institution. The match may be provided in cash or by in-kind contributions and other non-monetary support.

Can office supplies be used as an in-kind match?

Yes. Office supplies can be used as an in-kind match as long as the cost is a relatively small percentage of the total amount of the match and the supplies is necessary for the achievement of the project’s goals. Costs and relevance of the equipment must be explained in the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative. Note that if the office supplies is not provided at the level of costs outlined in the application, then that part of the match must be accounted for in some other way during the project period – e.g., direct funds or in-kind services.

Can matching funds be used for construction, provided no EPA funds are used for construction?

No. As explained in the NOFO, the non-federal match must be for an allowable cost. The use of direct EPA funding for construction is not allowable in the Environmental Education grant program, therefore construction costs may not be used for cost share/match. See Section III (D) - Ineligible Costs or Activities and Other Considerations of the NOFO for additional information on this grant program’s ineligible costs and activities.  

Can the non-federal matching funds be provided by a partner?

Yes. Applicants may ask partners to assist with matching funds requirements.

If a tribal (or other type) organization becomes a partner in the EE grant application and already receives funds from another office in EPA (or other federal agency), do those funds become tribal (or considered the organization's own funds) and therefore become eligible for use as part of the entire required 25% match?

No. The funds from another EPA office (or other federal agency) are still federal funds and may not be used as any part of the required 25% match.

What is “program income” and how and when may it be used by the recipient?

Program income is defined as the money a grant recipient earns as a direct result of a grant-supported activity. For example, registration fees charged for any conference or training course supported with grant funds are considered program income. A terms and conditions document will be issued by the Project Officer after an award is made to indicate how the program income shall be used. In most cases, program income will be used to pay for specified grant costs that are eligible and allowable and that further the project’s goals.

May an applicant use program income as part of their non-federal cost share/match?

Yes. Program income can be used to finance the non-federal cost share (match) of the project.

What is an Indirect Cost Rate?

An Indirect Cost Rate is a percentage of an organization’s costs allowed for overhead and administrative expenses, determined to be fair within the boundaries of sound administrative principles.

What is an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement?

An Indirect Cost Rate Agreement is a negotiated agreement between a grant recipient and the cognizant Federal agency which identifies the fairness and basis of the indirect cost rate.

Does an applicant have to have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in place when they apply for funds from this grants program?

No. An applicant does not have to have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in place when they apply for a grant. Applicants can begin the negotiations for an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, request an extension of an IDC rate, or use the 10% de minimus rate, at the same time that they apply for a grant to this program. However, recipients who do not use the 10% de minimus may not receive reimbursement for indirect costs until an approved indirect cost rate, as described in Section 6.1 of EPA’s Indirect Cost Policy, is obtained.

What if I don’t have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement?

Applicants without a current IDC rate have different options(e.g. the 10% de minimis rate)available to them depending on their specific situation. Please consult the policy, guidance, and training available in RAIN-2018-G02.

If I don’t have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement and do not apply for one, does this mean I am not eligible to allocate event 10% for indirect costs?

No. Revisions to 2 CFR 200.414(f) effective in November 2020 allow any recipient that does not currently have a negotiated indirect cost rate to use a de minimis 10% rate distributed to Modified Total direct costs as defined in 2 CFR 200.1. This 10% rate may be used indefinitely (unless an indirect cost rate is subsequently negotiated) and must be used consistently for all Federal awards. Refer to EPA’s  IDC Policy and IDC Guidance for additional information.

If an applicant does not have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with their cognizant Federal agency and does not intend to propose one prior to their grant application submission, what costs cannot be included in their proposed budget?

If there is no Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in place and the applicant does not intend to propose a rate to their cognizant agency, indirect costs may not be included in the budget. Indirect costs are defined in 2 CFR 200.1 as follows:

Indirect (F&A) costs means those costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. To facilitate equitable distribution of indirect expenses to the cost objectives served, it may be necessary to establish a number of pools of indirect (F&A) costs. Indirect (F&A) cost pools must be distributed to benefitted cost objectives on bases that will produce an equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.

Our university has a large indirect cost rate. If we reduce our indirect cost rate can the amount reflected in the use of a lowered indirect cost rate be counted toward the matching requirement in this grant program?

Yes, under 2 CFR 200.306(c) recipients with approved negotiated IDC rates may use unrecovered IDCs, including IDCs attributable to cost-sharing or matching, to meet a required or voluntary cost-share with prior EPA approval. You will need to provide a written copy of the university’s current negotiated cost rate agreement with the application. Please see Section 6.5 of EPA’s Indirect Cost Policy for additional information about using unrecovered IDCs for match.

Are grantees to apply their indirect cost rate to each of the $5,000 subawards?

It depends on the prime recipient’s indirect cost rate agreement. Prime recipients (typically nonprofits and institutions of higher education) whose indirect cost rates are distributed to Modified Total Direct Costs as defined in 2 CFR 200.1 or a similar distribution base may distribute their indirect cost rate to the first $25,000 of subawards. These recipients may apply their indirect cost rate to their subawards.

Other recipients (typically units of government) may have indirect cost distribution bases that are limited to salaries and fringe benefits. These prime recipients may not apply their indirect cost rates to their subawards.

What is the limit for indirect costs under the matching funds category?

The only limit on using indirect costs as part of the 25% match is the limit set by the indirect cost rate agreement the applicant has with the federal government. Indirect costs can be used as a match only when the applicant has an indirect cost rate agreement in place with the federal government, and the applicant has agreed to waive reimbursement for the part of the indirect costs that will be used as match. Therefore, for example, an applicant who has an indirect cost rate agreement with the federal government of 50% of costs could waive their right to reimbursement on half of that amount and claim the 25% they were not reimbursed as part of their required match. The dollar amount to be used as match cannot exceed the amount limited by the agreed upon rate, however. In the example given, the applicant could not claim 60% of their costs as indirect costs and say they were waiving all of that amount to be claimed as match.

Can the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate be applied toward all line items of the budget? 

No, the 10% rate should only be applied to your modified total direct costs, which includes salaries, wages, fringe benefits, material, supplies, services, travel and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward.

The 10% rate cannot be applied to equipment, capital expenditures, patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs and the portion of each subaward in excess of $25,000 excluded costs from the budget.  

Can our organization spend the majority of our federal funds on a single item such as a vehicle or a large piece of equipment?

Please keep in mind that the purpose of this grant is to promote environmental stewardship and help develop knowledgeable and responsible students, teachers, and citizens. This grant program provides financial support for projects that design, demonstrate, and/or disseminate environmental education practices, methods, or techniques, as described in this notice, that will serve to increase environmental literacy and encourage behavior that will benefit the environment in the local community(ies) in which they are located.

With this in mind, if expenses to purchase a vehicle, large equipment, or materials to build a vehicle dominate the budget and the project period, then most likely the project runs the risk of failing to meet the very purpose and goals of this solicitation.

Are stipends (teacher, student, or other project participant) an allowable cost?

Stipends are an allowable cost and must be categorized as "Other" in your project budget.

When is it allowable for a grant recipient to use federal funds to purchase food/beverages?

Generally, when a speaker or a presentation/panel is provided or other work is being done during breakfast or lunch at a conference/workshop or field trip, it is allowable to use grant funds to pay for meals for the participants. It is also generally allowable to use grant funds to pay for light refreshments/snacks offered during breaks at conferences/workshops or field trips. The specific event at which meals and/or light refreshments/snacks will be provided must be described in the scope of work and the plan for the event, including the provision for refreshments AND must be pre-approved by the Project Officer.

Meals and light refreshments provided at a grant recipient’s staff meetings are not allowable, nor are refreshments for evening receptions. Meals and receptions where alcohol is served are not allowable even if the grant funds are not used for the alcohol. Generally, banquets (especially evening banquets) paid for with grant funds are not allowed, nor is any EPA-funded entertainment. Also not allowed are any sort of EPA-funded events that conduct any fund-raising or involve strategies to solicit contributions, endowments, gifts or bequests.

Please note that a determination of reasonableness and necessity of costs for light refreshments/snacks and meals will be made on a case by case basis and included in a Terms and Conditions document at the time of the award of a grant.

What are Participant Support Costs and how should they be categorized in the Detailed Budget and SF-424A?

Participant Support Costs are direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences, or training projects. Applicants should place all Participant Support Costs in the “Other” category of their Detailed Budget and SF-424A.

Additional information about participant support costs is contained in RAIN-2018-G05, “EPA Guidance on Participant Support Costs.

What is the difference between the Budget we must provide on the form 424A and the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative that the NOFO also requires us to include?

The Budget form (SF-424A) is a standard government form that must be included in every grant application or application made to a federal grant program. It asks for dollar amounts in specified categories (such as Federal Funds and Non-Federal Funds) for particular line items (such as Personnel, Travel, Supplies, etc.).  See Appendix B: Federal Forms and Instructions of the NOFO for additional guidance on completing the SF-424A.  

A Detailed Budget Table and Narrative can be presented in any format (i.e., no particular form is required) but must include the same dollar amounts in the same categories and line items as the  SF-424A, in much greater detail, with an accompanying narrative about how those funds will be used. For example, for Personnel in a Detailed Budget, an applicant should identify not only the dollar amount to be spent on this line item, but also the personnel who will be paid (or will volunteer) to staff and manage the project, including names, titles and roles, and how much of their time will be spent working on the project. For Travel, identify not only the dollar amounts to be spent, but also who will be traveling, to where, and what the costs will entail (e.g., airfare, hotel rooms, meals, etc.) Every line item in the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative should be presented in this level of detail. Appendix D: Detailed Budget Table and Narrative of the NOFO provides instructions for completing your Detailed Budget Table and Narrative. This appendix also includes an example of a Detailed Budget Table and Narrative (with the narrative written inside of the table) and a template applicants can use when creating their own Detailed Budget Table and Narratives. The example in Appendix D shows an appropriate level of detail to explain the dollars requested.    

Be sure to check both the SF 424A and the Detailed Budget Table and Narrative for mathematical errors before submitting them. Make sure all line item and total dollar amounts are the same in both budgets. And, make certain that un-allowed items, such as construction costs, are not included in either budget. Additionally, it is recommended applicant’s review EPA’s Interim General Budget Development Guidance for Applicants and Recipients of EPA Financial Assistance and view EPA’s Developing a Budget Webinar and How to Develop a Budget online training course before creating their project budgets.

Award Information

When should applicants plan for their projects to start?

All applicants should plan for their projects to start no earlier than July 1, 2024 and no later than November 1, 2024.

How are applications evaluated?

All applications are evaluated for eligibility using the threshold eligibility criteria described in Section III (C) of the NOFO. Review panel(s) will review, score, and rank all eligible applications that pass the threshold eligibility review based on the merit evaluation criteria listed in Section V (A) of the NOFO. The review panel(s) will include EPA staff and may also include staff from other federal agencies and external subject matter experts who are free from any actual or apparent conflicts of interest. Applications will be reviewed and scored based on specific criteria established for each section of the application, and then will be ranked based on the reviewers' scores, and the scores and rankings will be provided to the EPA Headquarters or Regional Selection Official(s) for final funding decisions. More information can be found in Section V of the NOFO.

Are applicants required to address the expected outcomes listed in Section I (F)(2) of the current solicitation notice?

Applicants that address one or more of the Short-, Medium-, and Long-term outcomes listed in Section I (G) of the current solicitation notice may receive a higher score in the evaluation of their application. Appendix G: Logic Model Components, Example, and Template of the NOFO contains more detailed information on this grant program’s expected outputs and outcomes.

Who makes the selection for grants?

A Selection Official in each of the EPA's Regional Offices will make the final selections for grants awarded from the solicitation when it is specified in the solicitation notice that EPA is seeking to fund regional or local grant projects. A Selection Official in the Headquarters Office of Environmental Education will make the final selections when the solicitation notice specifies that EPA seeks to fund national, multi-state, or large model grants. Section V (B): Review and Selection Process of the NOFO.

Will my application be penalized if I don't have any past performance or experience with federal funding?

No. Applicants who do not have any relevant or available past performance or past reporting information must indicate this in the appropriate section of their application and will receive a neutral score for these sub-factors. However, if you do not provide any response about past performance or experience with federal funding, you may receive a score of 0 for these factors.

What is the length of a project period?

EPA will accept applications for one or two-year project periods or any timeframe between one and two years. The application must demonstrate clearly how the project will be completed in the time frame proposed.

If my project period is two years, instead of one, will I receive additional funding?

No. EPA total funding will be the same regardless of project period (i.e., if a 2-year project is proposed for $100,000, the award amount is $100,000 for the entire two years and no additional funding will be issued for the second year).  

At the end of the grant project period, does EPA expect to see a project fully completed through the use of its funds or can EPA funding be one source among many to produce a project whose costs exceed the amount requested from EPA and may take more than 2 years to complete?

Regardless of how much a project costs or how long it takes, the portion of the project that is funded by EPA must be completed in the given time associated with the grant funds; i.e., 1 or 2 years, or a timeframe between one and two years, whatever is requested in the application.

Are there any circumstances where awardees will receive only partial funding for projects?

Yes. In appropriate circumstances, EPA reserves the right to partially fund applications by funding discrete portions or phases of a proposed project. If EPA decides to partially fund an application, it will do so in a manner that does not prejudice any applicants or affect the basis upon which the application or portion thereof, was evaluated or selected for award, and therefore maintains the integrity of the competition and selection process.

Post Award Information

Is there more emphasis on reporting quantitative outputs (number of workshops or number of people educated) than on measurable outcomes (project participants becoming environmental stewards in the way they live their lives)?

No. EPA values both quantitative outputs and measurable outcomes. Both should be included in the Logic Model in a grant application and reported in the semi-annual and final reports.

Do I need to report on outputs and outcomes to the EPA during the project period?

Yes. Outputs and short-term outcomes must be reported to EPA within the project period. Appendix G: Logic Model Components, Example, and Template in the NOFO includes more detailed information on expected outputs and outcomes from environmental education grants.

What are the general reporting requirements for an EE grant?

Quarterly progress reports and a detailed final report will be required. Specific details on the content of these reports will be provided in the Programmatic Terms and Conditions and Welcome Packet, after awards are made. The quarterly progress reports will be submitted electronically to the EPA Project Officer within 30 days after each reporting period. The final report shall be submitted electronically to the EPA Project Officer within 120 calendar days of the completion of the period of performance. Award recipients may be provided with additional information and guidance on reporting performance measures and project progress after award.

If a grantee’s project leads to a viable and profitable patent, does the grantee have 100% rights to the patent or does the EPA get a percentage?

Rights to inventions made under this assistance agreement are subject to federal patent and licensing regulations, which are codified at Title 37 CFR Part 401 and Title 35 USC Sections 200-212. Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act (set forth in 35 USC 200-212), EPA retains the right to a worldwide, nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice the invention owned by the assistance agreement holder, as defined in the Act. To streamline the invention reporting process and to facilitate compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act, the recipient must utilize the Interagency Edison extramural invention reporting system at iEdison.gov. Annual utilization reports must be submitted through the system. The recipient is required to notify the Project Officer identified on the award document when an invention report, patent report, or utilization report is filed at iEdison.gov. EPA elects not to require the recipient to provide a report prior to the close-out of a funding agreement listing all subject inventions or stating that there were none.

How long do past EE grantees need to retain their records?

Grantees are required to keep financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to the EE grant for a period of three years after the Federal Financial Report is submitted. For further information, please review 2 CFR 200.334.

Education

Contact Us about Environmental Education
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on July 17, 2024