Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. TRI National Analysis
  3. Waste Management

Trends in Waste Management

Waste streams generated during normal industrial operations may be recycled, combusted for energy recovery, treated, or released. For example, facilities report the recovery of solvents as a recycling method, or the destruction of a chemical waste through incineration as treatment. This figure shows the 10-year trend in on-site and off-site waste managed.

 

From 2013 to 2022:

  • Waste managed increased by 2.0 billion pounds (7%).
    • Recycling increased by 3.5 billion pounds (32%), largely driven by several chemical manufacturing facilities that each reported recycling more than one billion pounds annually in recent years.
    • Disposal or other releases decreased by 703 million pounds (-18%).
    • Treatment decreased by 1.0 billion pounds (-12%).
    • Energy recovery increased by 191 million pounds (7%).
  • The number of facilities that report to TRI has declined by 2% since 2013. Reasons for this decrease include facility closures, outsourcing of operations to other countries, and facilities reducing their manufacture, processing, or other use of TRI-listed chemicals to below the reporting thresholds.

Facilities report both on- and off-site waste management. The following chart shows the relative quantities of on-site and off-site waste management methods for 2022.

 

Note: Percentages do not sum to 100% due to rounding.

For 2022, 87% of waste was managed on site.

  • Most waste managed off site is recycled. Most of this recycling is reported by the primary and fabricated metals sectors. Facilities in these sectors often send scrap metal containing TRI chemicals such as zinc and copper off site for recycling.
  • The 2022 distribution of waste managed on site and off site is similar to previous years.

Previous Next

This page was published in March 2024 and uses the 2022 TRI National Analysis dataset made public in TRI Explorer in October 2023.

TRI National Analysis

  • TRI Program Home
  • Introduction
    • TRI Data Considerations
  • Pollution Prevention
    • Source Reduction Activities
    • Source Reduction Activities by Chemical & Industry
    • Green Chemistry & Engineering Activities
    • Reported Barriers to Source Reduction
    • Source Reduction Activities by Parent Company
  • Waste Management
    • Trends in Waste Management
    • Waste Management by Chemical & Industry
    • Non-Production-Related Waste Managed
    • Waste Managed by Parent Company
  • Releases of Chemicals
    • Trends in Releases
    • Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Potential Risks from TRI Chemicals
      • Hazard & Risk-Screening Trend
    • Air Releases
      • Air Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Water Releases
      • Water Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Land Disposal
      • Land Disposal by Chemical & Industry
  • Chemical Profiles
    • Lead
    • Mercury
    • Dioxins
    • Ethylene Oxide
    • Carcinogens
    • PFAS
  • Comparing Industry Sectors
    • Manufacturing Sectors
      • Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
    • Chemical Manufacturing
      • Chemical Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
      • Greenhouse Gas Reporting in the Chemical Manufacturing Sector
    • Primary Metals Manufacturing
      • Primary Metals Waste Management Trend
    • Metal Mining
      • Metal Mining Waste Management Trend
    • Electric Utilities
      • Electric Utilities Waste Management Trend
      • Greenhouse Gas Reporting in the Electric Utilities Sector
    • Federal Facilities
      • Federal Facilities by Industry
      • Waste Management by Federal Facilities
  • Where You Live
    • EPA Regions
    • States & Metropolitan Areas
    • Watersheds
    • Tribal Communities
  • TRI Connections
    • TRI Around the World
    • Mapping Cross-Border Transfers
  • Past National Analyses
Contact Us About the TRI National Analysis
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on January 6, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.