Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. TRI National Analysis
  3. Waste Management

Waste Management by Chemical and Industry

Waste Managed by Chemical

This figure shows the TRI chemicals managed as waste in the greatest quantities from 2013 to 2022.

 

Note: In this figure, the metals (lead and zinc) are combined with their metal compounds, although metals and compounds of the same metal are listed separately on the TRI list.

From 2013 to 2022:

  • Facilities reported waste managed for almost 600 chemicals and chemical categories. The graph above shows the nine chemicals managed as waste in the largest quantities. Together, these chemicals represent 53% of the total waste managed reported to TRI.
  • Of the chemicals shown above, facilities reported increased quantities of waste managed for: cumene, dichloromethane (methylene chloride), ethylene, and n-hexane.
    • Cumene waste managed during 2022 was almost twenty times higher than the quantity of cumene waste managed during 2013, mostly driven by one facility in the petrochemical manufacturing sector that reported recycling over 3 billion pounds of cumene annually from 2014 to 2022. [Click to view facility details in the TRI P2 Search Tool]
    • Dichloromethane waste managed increased by 803 million pounds (44%). Trends in dichloromethane waste management were driven by recycling from two plastics material and resin manufacturing facilities which together reported 95% of all dichloromethane waste managed for 2022.
    • Ethylene waste managed increased by 546 million pounds (46%), driven by facilities in the chemical manufacturing sector.
    • n-Hexane waste managed increased by 652 million pounds (63%). This was mostly driven by one soybean processing facility which increased its n-hexane recycling by almost 600 million pounds since 2013. [Click to view facility details in the TRI P2 Search Tool]

From 2021 to 2022:

  • Quantities of TRI chemical waste managed increased for several chemicals including:
    • n-Hexane increased by 129 million pounds (8%).
    • Toluene increased by 56 million pounds (4%).
    • Lead increased by 41 million pounds (4%).
  • Quantities of TRI chemical waste managed decreased for several chemicals including:
    • Dichloromethane decreased by 435 million pounds (-14%).
    • Ethylene decreased by 149 million pounds (-8%).
    • Cumene decreased by 63 million pounds (-2%).
  • Quantities of TRI chemical waste managed remained about the same for zinc, methanol, and hydrochloric acid.

Waste Managed by Industry

This figure shows the industry sectors that managed the most TRI chemical waste from 2013 to 2022.

 

From 2013 to 2022:

  • The eight sectors in this chart consistently reported managing the most waste since 2013. The amount of waste managed by these sectors has changed year to year, especially for the chemical manufacturing sector. The chemical manufacturing sector accounted for 44% of all waste managed in 2013 and increased to 54% in 2022.
  • Two of the sectors shown in the graph increased their quantities of waste managed:
    • Chemical manufacturing increased by 3.8 billion pounds (33%).
    • Food manufacturing increased by 777 million pounds (54%).
  • The quantity of waste generated in some industries fluctuates considerably from year to year due to changes in production or other factors. For example, quantities of waste managed reported by metal mining facilities can change significantly based on differences in the composition of waste rock.

From 2021 to 2022:

  • Industry sectors that reported the greatest changes in waste management quantities were:
    • Chemical manufacturing decreased by 875 million pounds (-5%).
    • Food manufacturing increased by 157 million pounds (8%).
    • Electric utilities decreased by 100 million pounds (-10%).

Previous Next

This page was published in March 2024 and uses the 2022 TRI National Analysis dataset made public in TRI Explorer in October 2023.

TRI National Analysis

  • TRI Program Home
  • Introduction
    • TRI Data Considerations
  • Pollution Prevention
    • Source Reduction Activities
    • Source Reduction Activities by Chemical & Industry
    • Green Chemistry & Engineering Activities
    • Reported Barriers to Source Reduction
    • Source Reduction Activities by Parent Company
  • Waste Management
    • Trends in Waste Management
    • Waste Management by Chemical & Industry
    • Non-Production-Related Waste Managed
    • Waste Managed by Parent Company
  • Releases of Chemicals
    • Trends in Releases
    • Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Potential Risks from TRI Chemicals
      • Hazard & Risk-Screening Trend
    • Air Releases
      • Air Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Water Releases
      • Water Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Land Disposal
      • Land Disposal by Chemical & Industry
  • Chemical Profiles
    • Lead
    • Mercury
    • Dioxins
    • Ethylene Oxide
    • Carcinogens
    • PFAS
  • Comparing Industry Sectors
    • Manufacturing Sectors
      • Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
    • Chemical Manufacturing
      • Chemical Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
      • Greenhouse Gas Reporting in the Chemical Manufacturing Sector
    • Primary Metals Manufacturing
      • Primary Metals Waste Management Trend
    • Metal Mining
      • Metal Mining Waste Management Trend
    • Electric Utilities
      • Electric Utilities Waste Management Trend
      • Greenhouse Gas Reporting in the Electric Utilities Sector
    • Federal Facilities
      • Federal Facilities by Industry
      • Waste Management by Federal Facilities
  • Where You Live
    • EPA Regions
    • States & Metropolitan Areas
    • Watersheds
    • Tribal Communities
  • TRI Connections
    • TRI Around the World
    • Mapping Cross-Border Transfers
  • Past National Analyses
Contact Us About the TRI National Analysis
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on December 27, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.